Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withscriptsthat contain un-shared memory

[Matt Sergeant]

On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Sam Horrocks wrote:

>  > Folks, your discussion is not short of wrong statements that can be easily
>  > proved, but I don't find it useful.
>
>  I don't follow.  Are you saying that my conclusions are wrong, but
>  you don't want to bother explaining why?
>
>  Would you agree with the following statement?
>
>     Under apache-1, speedycgi scales better than mod_perl with
>     scripts that contain un-shared memory

NO!

When you can write a trans handler or an auth handler with speedy, then I
might agree with you. Until then I must insist you add "mod_perl
Apache::Registry scripts" or something to that affect.

-- 
<Matt/>

    /||    ** Director and CTO **
   //||    **  AxKit.com Ltd   **  ** XML Application Serving **
  // ||    ** http://axkit.org **  ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP  **
 // \\| // **     Personal Web Site: http://sergeant.org/     **
     \\//
     //\\
    //  \\