On 25 May 2001, Chip Turner wrote: > Code is cleaner if you can say "the nth parameter is > derived from the base class Foo::Bar" as opposed to "the > nth parameter is an object that must support the baz, > blah, foop, and fitz methods that accept parameters in > the following way..." you can certainly say "the nth parameter implements interface Foo::Bar", and provide Foo/Bar.pod that describes the interface, and get the exact same benefit. i question the wisdom of relying on a code-level inheritance usage to communicate class relationships. isn't that why we use class diagrams and pod?
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Paul Lindner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stephen Adkins
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages brian moseley
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages brian moseley
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stas Bekman
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stas Bekman
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Kip Hampton
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages James G Smith
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stephen Adkins
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stephen Adkins