On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:48:38AM +0200, Gerald Richter wrote:
> > regarding the tools that dovetail into the mod_perl paradigm,
> > who's got a comparison over relative performance (and other
> > strengths/weaknesses) of various templating methods?
> 
> There are various discussions on the mod_perl list about this topic in the
> past (so take a look at the archives). Also there was an start to write such
> a comparsion, but I am not aware that anybody has really finished it. The
> only benchmarks I know are from Joshua. I append his mail below.
> 
> NOTE: While the hello.xxx benchmarks only prints "Hello world", so they only
> measures the startup overhead of the toolkit, the h2000.xxx tests tends a
> little bit more towards a real application.

this is interesting information -- perhaps misleading to use the
microscopic "hello world" but still it gives a starting point:

here i sorted by hits-per-second 

> Test Name                      Test File  Hits/sec   Bytes/Hit
> ------------                   ---------- ---------- ----------
> HTML static                    hello.html 1158.4     311 bytes
> mod_include SSI                hello.shtm  996.6     198 bytes
> mod_caucho JSP                 hello.jsp   860.6     230 bytes
> mod_perl handler               hello.benc  852.6     196 bytes
> mod_php PHP                    hello.php   734.8     225 bytes
> Apache::Registry v2.01 CGI Raw hello_raw.  706.4     52 bytes
> Apache::Dispatch v0.08 handler hello/worl  656.1     196 bytes
> HTML::Template v2.0            hello.htmp  567.2     198 bytes
> Apache::SSI v2.16              hello.shtm  559.4     199 bytes
> Template v2.00 Toolkit         hello.tt    522.1     198 bytes
> Apache::Registry v2.01 CGI.pm  hello.reg   458.5     216 bytes
> HTML::Embperl v2.0a18          hello.epl   458.2     219 bytes
> Apache::ASP v2.07              hello.asp   390.6     241 bytes
> Apache::ePerl                  hello.eper  344.8     217 bytes
> HTML::Mason v0.895             hello.mas   365.3     197 bytes

i bet CGI would be 200.0 or so... ?

and here's the "handler actualy does some work" set:

> mod_caucho JSP 2000            h2000.jsp   328.9     28964 byte
> mod_php PHP 2000               h2000.php   261.8     28865 byte
> HTML::Embperl v2.0a18 2000     h2000.epl   247.3     28809 byte
> Apache::ASP v2.07 2000         h2000.asp   228.0     28997 byte
> HTML::Mason v0.895 2000        h2000.mas   222.9     28798 byte
> Template v2.00 Toolkit 2000    h2000.tt     55.6     28888 byte

wow. template toolkil took a big hit, there. (no mod_perl on
this list? hmm!)

-- 
I figure: if a man's gonna gamble, may as well do it
without plowing.   -- Bama Dillert, "Some Came Running"

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/newbiedoc -- we need your brain!
http://www.dontUthink.com/ -- your brain needs us!

-- 
I figure: if a man's gonna gamble, may as well do it
without plowing.   -- Bama Dillert, "Some Came Running"

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/newbiedoc -- we need your brain!
http://www.dontUthink.com/ -- your brain needs us!

Reply via email to