[this probably belong to the list] > I am sending this after a suggestion that was given to me during in a > perlmonks discussion. > > I feel that mod_perl's single threadedness on the Win32 platforms really > warrants some more prominence in the docs. (How about 18pt bold red > warning on page 1? ;) ) > > I was obviously adversely affected by finding out about this late in a > development cycle (having been lulled in a feeling of false confidence > by my positive Unix experiences), but I see that dismayed surprise > appear to dominate most mailing list postings on this subject. > > So I'd say that some discussion of this fact should be carried out - for > instance where the win32 support level is discussed - especially given > that a stuck mod_perl will also occlude also the static pages, which is > really nasty.
I've never used mod_perl with windows, so I cannot help here. If somebody sends me a proper doc patch, I'd be delighted to apply it. The reason for winXX not featuring in the mod_perl docs is that hardly anybody uses mod_perl on windows, or that's my feeling from seeing the discussions on the list, which can be wrong of course. _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
