On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Paul Lindner wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > At 08:19 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
> >
> > Ok, hit me over the head.  Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy?
>
> Apache::CacheContent gives you more control over the caching process
> and keeps the expiration headers from leaking to the browser.  Or
> maybe you want to dynamically control the TTL?
>
> sub ttl {
>   ...
>   if ($load_avg > 5) {
>      return 60 * 5;
>   } else {
>      return 60;
>   }
> }

While a ttl might be useful to some projects, others I'm sure would prefer
a per-hit checking, so you can say "Yes, this thing has changed now".

Just a thought.

-- 
<Matt/>

    /||    ** Founder and CTO  **  **   http://axkit.com/     **
   //||    **  AxKit.com Ltd   **  ** XML Application Serving **
  // ||    ** http://axkit.org **  ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP  **
 // \\| // ** mod_perl news and resources: http://take23.org  **
     \\//
     //\\
    //  \\

Reply via email to