On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Paul Lindner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > At 08:19 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote:
> >
> > Ok, hit me over the head. Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy?
>
> Apache::CacheContent gives you more control over the caching process
> and keeps the expiration headers from leaking to the browser. Or
> maybe you want to dynamically control the TTL?
>
> sub ttl {
> ...
> if ($load_avg > 5) {
> return 60 * 5;
> } else {
> return 60;
> }
> }
While a ttl might be useful to some projects, others I'm sure would prefer
a per-hit checking, so you can say "Yes, this thing has changed now".
Just a thought.
--
<Matt/>
/|| ** Founder and CTO ** ** http://axkit.com/ **
//|| ** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving **
// || ** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
// \\| // ** mod_perl news and resources: http://take23.org **
\\//
//\\
// \\