On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:31:36AM -0800, Paul Lindner wrote: > Right. A more elaborate Apache::CacheContent would have a filename > hash function, and a separate cache directory structure along the > lines of Cache::FileCache.
Just curious -- any reason not to use Cache::Cache as the persistance mechanism? It was designed for exactly this scenario and could provide a nice abstraction for the filesystem or shared memory, as well as handle things like filename hashing and branching directories (and namespaces, size limits, OS independance, taint checking, and more). -DeWitt
