On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, David Harris wrote: > (a) See if others also think that the three alternatives for a mod_perl site > are not very desirable. If you agree, please speak up and say that you > agree.
I thought Thomas' was fine but I think I actually prefer the ASF one. > (b) See if others also think that using the ASF generic site design (even > though it's not "cool and distinctive") would be a good idea. If you agree, > please speak up and say that you agree. I agree. > Also, lets keep in mind something that Stas pointed out to me: most anything > is a step up from our existing site design. So, if we go with one of the > three existing options it's still a step up. Damn straight. -dave /*================== www.urth.org We await the New Sun ==================*/
