---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:30:24 -0800 (PST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_perl site challenge: proposal to use ASF site design
David wrote: > (a) See if others also think that the three alternatives for a mod_perl site > are not very desirable. If you agree, please speak up and say that you > agree. I don't have a strong opinion. > (b) See if others also think that using the ASF generic site design (even > though it's not "cool and distinctive") would be a good idea. If you agree, > please speak up and say that you agree. I agree that using the ASF generic site is a good idea. And why not? mod_perl is so closely integrated with Apache, why shouldn't mod_perl's website at least adapt the Apache website look and feel? > Also, lets keep in mind something that Stas pointed out to me: most anything > is a step up from our existing site design. So, if we go with one of the > three existing options it's still a step up. That's for sure! :) -- keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] public key: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/kkeller/public_key alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/perl/fom