Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+
Just a thought. Thanks, -Zac ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "mod_perl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:08 AM Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 > Zac Morris wrote: > > Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that > > installed 2.0.40-dev > > > > and I'm still getting errors during "make test" of mod_perl 2. Does it have > > to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile? > > Yes, to compile 1.99_04 > > > Sorry if I'm just not getting it... > > It's easy: > > * httpd is changing all the time > * Perl is changing too > * mod_perl uses both APIs and therefore depends on the above two > > in order to give you a version where mod_perl uses the right APIs from > httpd and Perl, we say the versions that you've to use. > > Now if you go for the cvs versions, chances are that we didn't have a > chance to update mod_perl to the latest cvs changes in httpd, perl or > both. And this is the case that you hit. > > get 5.8.0-RC2 and 2.0.39 and then 1.99_04 will compile and pass all > tests 100%. > > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com >
