Hi Stas, On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I see no reason why we should mislead readers, saying do not upgrade to > 5.8.0, but to 5.7.2 instead. I'm sorry if I misled anyone. I thought it was clear that my own personal recommendation was "at least 5.7.2" and that there are those who would recommend 5.8.0 but I'm not one of them. That's because I have no personal experience of that release. Anyway, if they've read all this I think they have the idea now... :) 73, Ged.
