--- Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: > > > I have a choice between the very well tested 7.3 but highly likely > > to become unsupported by RedHat soon. Or I could go for RedHat 9.0
Ohh no no one is using RedHat support it is just the fact that most of the administrators are used to RedHat and I am not going to be maintaining the servers in the long run therefore I wanted them to have something they know their way around. I want something which they can manage on their own, they can upgrade without breaking everything down - and ending up ruining my happiness :). I do a minimal install for the servers anyway other than kernel and perl they wont have much else to worry about. Ofcoure RedHat 7.3 has the notorious gcc 2.96 - no body has been able to figure out whether it is actually broken or not I guess :). > Do you actually need or use RH support? I'm not saying that there's > anything wrong with it, but by the time you've a few years of Linux > experience under your belt it's unlikely you'll need much more than > the odd security patch - and you'll be able to deal with that sort of > thing easily, even if it means installing a new kernel. The problem with ease of maintenance is that I need to give something which will have patches coming out for it for atleast a year - with the way new versions are poping up with all the distros I guess it is a dream for the time being. Mithun __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com