On, or in the near vicinity of Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:23:00 +0200 Enrico Sorcinelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has thus spoken:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:57:00 -0700 > Adi Fairbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Apache::WebMessaging > > > > I am about ready to release an intraserver web-messaging application for > > mod_perl. A brief description of the app follows; I'd like to hear some > > comments from the mod_perl/Perl/P5EE community on: > > You could look about Apache::* modules naming conventions: > > http://perl.apache.org/products/apache-modules.html#Module_Naming_Conventions > > Apache::App::WebMessaging namespace could be a right place :-) > According to the asterisk note below Apache::App:: "However, if you are planning a substantial framework with many inter-related modules, you should probably go with a top-level namespace outside of Apache::." This app already has 7-8 inter-related modules, though I would not call it a substantial framework. In fact it requires you to already have your own application framework setup in order to use it. It's basically a plug-in application for your existing mod_perl framework. I could rename it to just WebMessaging:: but it is specifically designed for mod_perl, which is why I think it should go in Apache::. Also, I noticed there are currently no Apache::App:: modules. Should this be the first?? -Adi
