On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 04:14, Stas Bekman wrote: > Ah, sorry for chiming in again, it's true regarding the memory, but not that > bad regarding performance. The only real performance overhead is to spawn a > new perl interpreter (which is just terrible if you have many modules > preloaded), which you can prespawn.
I was actually thinking of how a 5.8 perl compiled with threads is about 15% slower than a non-threaded version. However, this is 5.6 with ithreads that we're talking about, so I don't really know how much difference it makes. - Perrin -- Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
