Garth Webb wrote: > So my question is, what do you think is the better alternative to > Apache::Registry? If its bad enough that someone like me might have > written a replacement, where is it? Do people really have conf files > with 100's of <Location> directives? It seems to me that most people > these days are using toolkits which take care of this URL location to > script location automatically, (thus my original question).
You might be looking for something more like this: http://daemoninc.com/PersistentPerl/ http://search.cpan.org/~horrocks/PersistentPerl-2.22/ I don't know if it's necessarily *better* than Apache::Registry, but I think in your situation it will give you a similar performance boost with somewhat less pain. -- -dave -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
