On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 05:02:30PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >If -lperl was specified on the link line and ldd does not show a > >dependency on libperl.so.N, then barring a complete linker fubar, it > >must be the case that a libperl.a was linked statically. > > I doubt that this is the case, because I asked Martin to run nm on > mod_perl.so and perl symbols were unresolved. Please see: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl/15266
Yes, I read the whole thread, this seems consistent with linking against a bogus libperl.a on the system (maybe from a different version of Perl) which doesn't define all the symbols which mod_perl needs. That seems far more likely than the linker being so borked it ignores -l flags. joe -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
