(I'm not sure if I should continue posting these reports
to the list. Please let me know if I should send them to just
you.)

Stas Bekman wrote:


Oh, sorry, for some reason I thought you were talking about the static build. Could you please post the output of:


t/TEST -conf -trace=debug

I downloaded the latest httpd (2.0.52) and the CVS version of mod_perl as of ~1600 California time.

Running this command results in:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] modperl-2.0]# t/TEST -conf -trace=debug
[ debug] loading custom config data from: '/usr/local/src/modperl-2.0/lib/Apache/TestConfigData.pm'
[ debug] configuring httpd
something is wrong, mod_perl 2.0 build should have supplied all the needed information to run the tests. Please post lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm along with the bug report at /usr/local/src/modperl-2.0/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm line 349.


The bug report shows the same problem as before - that httpd couldn't
be found.

Also this shouldn't affect things, but any difference if you set
APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES=1 env var?

APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES=1 t/TEST -conf

No.

By the way, I also tried to build the static version using
the command

perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/src/httpd-2.0.52

This resulted in the following error message:

Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
   MP_USE_STATIC = 1
   MP_AP_PREFIX = /usr/local/src/httpd-2.0.52
[  error] You specified MP_USE_STATIC but did not specify the arguments to httpd's 
./configure with MP_AP_CONFIGURE


Is this correct? Since I don't use any arguments to ./configure when I build httpd why do I need to use the MP_AP_CONFIGURE option?

--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html



Reply via email to