On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Octavian Rasnita wrote: > > What stopping you from applying them ? > > > > If the eol(end of line ^M) is wrong I can regenerate in on a > > windows computer for you. > > > > > I hope mod_perl 1.999.22 rc5 will also work with the old Apache::DBI. > > Nope not going to happen. > > I am not compiling Apache, perl and mod_perl under Windows > but I use the prebuild packages. I have installed mod_perl > using ppm, but Apache::DBI was not installed with it. > > I can compile Apache::DBI separately if it is necessary, > but I have only Visual Studio .Net 2003 and I don't think > it will work correctly because Apache and Perl were > compiled with Visual Studio 6.
That's potentially true in general, but Apache-DBI is a pure Perl module, so it doesn't need a C compiler to build. If you want to play around with it, we have a ppm package of Apache-DBI at http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ - you can install it, and then try patching the .pm files (either with a "patch" utility for Windows, or just manually). > I need mod_perl under Windows just for testing, so it > doesn't need to work very fast. Can I use just the DBI > module with mod_perl without using Apache::DBI? Under > Windows it would be OK for a while. Yes, DBI and mod_perl under Windows works fine. -- best regards, randy
