Jie Gao wrote:


On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Carl Johnstone wrote:


Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:02:48 +0100
From: Carl Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: RC5 really broke some stuff



People like Jonathan and myself just have to double up (or triple-up!)
because of the change. Try telling that to your bosses that the latest
version of modperl is holding things back ('told you we should've used
Java!').

Did your boss know that the "latest" version of mod_perl is actually a pre-release?

I'll agree that pre-release is a bad time to make API changes like this and
it would be better if it'd be done during the beta. It's only when a piece
of software is released that the developers are making the implicit promise
to not break anything.

If you're going to run beta or pre-release code - you've got to accept the
risks that go with that.


I think we all knew this. But rc4 was about the last one before formal release,
and Stas promised since rc2 or something that there would be no API change (I'm
not blaming him on this though). I've had rc4 in production for some time, and
I'll have to keep it possibly for a very long time to come.

Stas promised and kept his promises, until he was overruled by the majority of developers who decided to break his promises. But it's a history now. What's done is done. Moving on.



-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Reply via email to