On Thu, 5 May 2005, Stas Bekman wrote:

> Randy Kobes wrote:
> [...]
> > Does the following fix this?
> >
> > ===================================================================
> > Index: xs/APR/Status/APR__Status.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- xs/APR/Status/APR__Status.h     (revision 168337)
> > +++ xs/APR/Status/APR__Status.h     (working copy)
> > @@ -16,3 +16,5 @@
> >  #include "apr_errno.h"
> >
> >  #define mpxs_APR__Status_is_EAGAIN APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN
> > +#define mpxs_APR__Status_is_EACCES APR_STATUS_IS_EACCES
> > +#define mpxs_APR__Status_is_ENOENT APR_STATUS_IS_ENOENT
>
> +1
>
> Randy, if you spot locations in docs and tests that do a comparison with
> these two constants, which we will now have right, please adjust those.
> Thank you!

Thanks, Stas. I've done that, but unfortunately, like Steve,
I'm also finding these 2 tests still have problems :( I'll
keep looking ...

-- 
best regards,
randy

Reply via email to