This means the when the documentation holds information about situation where one has to use $r->status(), I would propose that in should add the use case of filters.
This has nothing TODO with your problem I only wanted to point out that not all cases where setting $r->status manually are documented there. Why are you running this as a registry script? You are referencing so many things only available in mod_perl that you could simply wrap your whole code inside "sub handler { }" and you don't have to set $r->status() manually which may be the problem. Tom Michael Greenish wrote: > I am working in modperl::registry (not writing my own > handlers) and I found this recipe on the modperl > website: > > http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/coding/cooking.html#Sending_Cookies_in_REDIRECT_Response__ModPerl__Registry_ > > And, sorry Tom, but I don't understand your response. > > > thanks, > > greanie > > --- Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Fred Moyer wrote: >> >>>Michael Greenish wrote: >>> >>>>use strict; >>> >>>[..] >>> >>> >>>># redirect >>>>$r->headers_out->set( Location => $redirectURL ); >>>>$r->status( REDIRECT ); >>> >>>>return REDIRECT; >>> >>>I see a few things here that catch my eye but what >> >>stands out the most >> >>>is the use of the same return code for the browser >> >>and apache. why are >> >>>you using $r->status? Is it one of the reasons >> >>listed here? >> >>This doesn't help but: >> >>To the list you definately have to add Filters where >>one mp2 or Apache i >>don't know doesn't care about the resturn value of >>the filter-handler. >> >>Tom >> >> >> > http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/Apache2/RequestRec.html#C_status_ > >>> >>Tom >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature