Hi! Is it possible to configure Perlbal so there is no single point of failure? I wanted to use perlbal as LB in front of few machines but decided to go with 2 LB's because they can work in redundant mode.
Denis -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Frank Wiles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2007 18:46 An: Perrin Harkins Cc: Clinton Gormley; modperl@perl.apache.org Betreff: Re: Growing Up On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:48:57 -0400 "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/17/07, Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > is it reasonable to serve your static files from a mod_perl server, > > as long as you have a proxy/pound/squid in front? > > Yes, but spending no time in mod_perl for a static file is better than > spending a little time, and the files will be served faster if there's > no extra proxying step. If you aren't having scaling problems, then > don't worry about it. Personally, I've fallen in love with Perlbal and it can serve up static files from disk so that would be probably what I would do in this situation. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiles.org ---------------------------------
