-----Original Message-----
>From: Foo JH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Aug 22, 2007 11:15 AM
>To: Jeff Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Jordan McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, modperl@perl.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Internal Server Error
>
>
>> So on the first case,we need to write the handler as
>> sub handler { my $r = shift; ...}
>> because Apache may call the function directly as Package::Name::handler.
>>
>> on the second case,we write handler as,
>> sub handler { my $class = shift; my $r = shift; ... }
>> because '->' is a method calling.
>>
>> Am I right?
>> btw,I always used the first config.
>Are there any technical advantages with either method, or is it a
>TIMTOWDI option given to the developers?
I don't see anyone.Modperl's documents say both are fine.
--
Jeff Pang - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.arcor.de/jeffpang/
