According to Fred Moyer <f...@redhotpenguin.com> on Wed, 06/29/11 at 14:04: > > My apologizes, I didn't mean to imply that you were inexperienced > overall, but it seemed like you didn't have much experience with > setting up mod_perl apps, specifically with startup.pl. Or whomever > built the app you were installing didn't put the startup.pl program > together like it is recommended in the docs.
No need to apologize. I just wanted to clarify for any who joined in the thread late. The application in question has no startup.pl file. It is a Mason based web application and starts with an index.html file that has embedded Perl code. I have only been working with this application for a few months, and due to its large size (92 MB deployed), I have yet to understand all aspects of it. Not only am I new to mod_perl2, I am also new to Mason, sigh... :-( > It looked like we kind of lost the 2.0.6-dev/5.14 aspect of that > thread too, and after running 5.14 with 2.0.6 for a month or so now, I > haven't run into any compatibility issues there. I was advised (by you?) to try mod_perl2 (2.0.6) just to see if 2.0.5 was at fault. I did and it wasn't. I am leaning toward some Perl 5.14 issue that exists within this large Perl web application. I have asked the developers there to try running their application under Perl 5.14 and have yet to hear any feedback on that suggestion. YMMV. BTW, several other Perl based web applications I have written are built on CGI::Application and do have what you call a startup.pl file although those (short) files are rarely, if ever, called "startup.pl". Maybe I need to read more about the mod_perl2 experience. :-) Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: w...@umich.edu 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->|
