Magnus Stenman wrote:
>
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 1999, Magnus Stenman wrote:
> >
> > > New apache-mod_ssl-1.3.4-2.2.2 RPMs are at
> > > http://www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/contrib/
> >
> > Great, Magnus. You're as fast with RPMs for the RedHat users as I'm with the
> > source distribution. I've to always really sprint with the FreeBSD port I
> > maintain myself to have a chance against you... ;-)
>
> Thanks :)
>
> BTW, is there any significant advantages yet with openssl versus SSLeay?
> If so, maybe there should be some openssl RPMs, and the apache RPMs
> should
> require openssl instead of SSLeay.
> (I guess you'd have to choose, the two ssl libs aren't interchangeable,
> right?)
>
I would prefer not to explicitly require SSLeay nor openssl,
which will make rpm require just libssl.so.0 and libcrypto.so.0
This way these can be provided by any package.
We dont say Requires: glibc to every package, do we? We depend
on major version numbers for the shared libraries.
--
Niels Poppe - org.net bv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
