If the LoadModule dirrective is also commented out, mod_ssl will not be
loaded, hence no key generated. no?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry, Richard
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 10:28 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Pros/Cons for using Apache with mod_ssl for non-SSL
> operation
>
>
> That's our preferred solution.
>
> Note that mod_ssl still insists that a server certificate exists which is
> used to generate temp RSA keys, so non-SSL users will need to install a
> dummy certificate even when they're serving only HTTP requests. Not a big
> deal, but something we need to consider.
>
> The other issues we're considering are:
>
> - performance impact when not serving HTTPS (if any, we haven't
> yet measured it)
> - impact on optional or user-written modules (which modules need
> mod_ssl's EAPI and which don't)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirk Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Pros/Cons for using Apache with mod_ssl for non-SSL
> operation
>
>
> Why not option a) and just comment out the SSL directives in httpd.conf?
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
