On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:14:06PM +0200, Owen Boyle wrote:
> hendy wrote:
> > > you are attempting NBVH with SSL (which is not possible).
>
> > it is possible - the mod_ssl error is not fatal - it just uses the same
> > certificate (which in cases of *.foobar.com is an acceptable solution - at
> > least for me).
>
> Proper NBVH requires that distinct sites can share the same IP address
> and port number. This cannot be supported using SSL.
>
let's call them properly certificated vhosts (they're just namebased on the
second, the apache layer, not at the mod_ssl layer :-)
> Anyway, glad you got it working eventually. You've got me worried about
> this IPv6 patch though...
i will try the v6 patch on 1.3.20 as soon as there is one - i will give you
my results :-)
regards,
-hendy
--
. ,!. . _ ___ ___________________________________________________ __ _ .
,j't. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [TESO] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] [HOME]
K=-=:: -=-> fax & vbox: [ +49-2561-959-556970 ] gsm/sms: [ +49-179-6443323 ]
"=i.: [-' PGP: ``finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]'' [www.team-teso.net/hendy]
/;:":.\ PGP Fprint: 5AAE 5111 2C39 5E86 9D45 70C3 CA8F 0C20 EF27 264A
. ;}' '(, . _ ___ ____________________________________________________ . :wq!
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
