On Thu, 2 May 2002, Dwayne Miller wrote: > First I've seen of the SSL issues still remaining. I thought 2.0 WOULD > have SSL because the SSL restrictions went away. Can you point me to a > location where I can catch up on the ongoing discussions/questions? > Not that I have a problem compiling it... just curious.
I honestly haven't followed it that closely. It's something along the lines of it's clear that we can distribute _source_ for strong encryption software from within the US, but it's not clear that we can distribute _binaries_ of strong encryption software. I personally think that's ridiculous, but some of the developers involved with creating the binary distributions just felt that this was the safer path until the government makes it clearer to us what's allowed and what's not. Search the archives for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's in there somewhere. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
