Yes... compiling 2.0.36 with mod ssl is easy... which part of compiling did you guys stocked? It should have the compile out/output text.... include in the email will help us to understand what happened and the next time you probably can compile the future version of apache
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cliff Woolley Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 7:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, John wrote: > Well, we got one response from Victor, but he seems to be unable to > follow through (we don't get any response from his private e-mail) so we > still have $500 for anyone who can give us working binaries of apache > 2.0.36 with mod-ssl... > Anyone? Is this actually possible? Has anyone ever got this right? Of course it's possible. I'd do it for you but I'm not convinced that I as a US citizen am allowed to export strong-encryption binaries from the US. Which is, of course, the entire reason that the official distributions don't come with mod_ssl binaries. --Cliff PS: If you can wait a few days, 2.0.37 will hopefully be out and it has some important bugs fixed. Just so you know. --------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server Project ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
