----- Original Message ----- From: "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:13 AM Subject: Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money
> I just recently built the 2.0.36 + ssl tree and had similar results. > Although the error messages were slightly different, the root cause > might be the same. > > Turns out that several .c and .h files are delivered with dates earlier > than the .y and .l files they are built from. However, the .c and .h > files are actually up-to-date. So, by simply 'touching' (I used an > editor to add a blank line) to the .c and .h files to make their dates > more recent than their source files, and the system will not try to > build them again. (I thought that I read that this problem had been > corrected in the 2.0.36 tree, but apparently not). > > Anyway, I also had to uninstall the bison utility (I did not have the > other required tools, lex, sed and yacc anyway) before this would > actually work. Having bison on my system, even with the modified file > dates, would still cause an error for some reason. Removing bison and > altering the file dates allowed the build to work as expected. > > The files that you need to 'touch' are > ssl_expr_parse.c > ssl_expr_parse.h > ssl_expr_scan.c In the version of Apache that I have (2.0.36), the .c and .h files above have later dates than the .y and .l files. Still, nmake tries to rebuild them. I got around this by taking out the generation steps in mod_ssl.mak. This works. I now have Apache 2.0..36 running on Win2K with ssl support. Thanks to everyone on this thread for their suggestions and shared experiences. Phil ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
