Hi all I agree, I haven't seen much movement/improvements with mod_ssl in the last months and in this industry things need to get moving in order to keep the software in touch with its neighbours (apache, open_ssl, mod_authz_ldap to name a few) and therefore each one improving on the other.
If Ralf cannot afford the time then I am for someone else (like you Tim) to take over the reigns (either fully or partially). It is really important that users see mod_ssl constantly improving itself. Best regards Jose Correia -----Original Message----- From: Tim Tassonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 15:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Maintainership of mod_ssl Hi Ralf and everybody Wouldn't it now be about time to transfer maintainership of mod_ssl to somebody else (if there is anybody willing and capable available) , as this software is now obviously unmaintained except for important security fixes. Ralf has done a tremendous job in providing and maintaining mod_ssl, but obviously has no more time left to actively work on it. But there are still people (me at least) who would like to enhance mod_ssl beyond the very neccessary. Unfortunately mails with patches to do so are not even replied. How do other people and most of all, how does Ralf think about this? Bye Tim ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
