On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:08:50 -0700 daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Part of the reson is that mod_ssl was moved into the Apache 2.0 > codebase, development has been quite active there. > So although 1.3 development may be necessary and useful, long term I > think 2.0 is the way to go Of course you are right. But at the present time, Apache 1.3 is still the widely used Apache production server, since most modules haven't been ported yet. I'm quite sure this situation will remain for a year or so. That's quite a long time to wait for needed functionality. Btw.: I'm definitely the wrong man for the job, lacking both resources and skills to be resonsible for such an important module. Bye Tim > > Cheers > > Daniel > > > Hi all > > > > I agree, I haven't seen much movement/improvements with mod_ssl in the > > last months and in this industry things need to get moving in order to > > keep the software in touch with its neighbours (apache, open_ssl, > > mod_authz_ldap to name a few) and therefore each one improving on the > > other. > > > > If Ralf cannot afford the time then I am for someone else (like you > > Tim) to take over the reigns (either fully or partially). It is really > > important that users see mod_ssl constantly improving itself. > > > > Best regards > > Jose Correia > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Tassonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 25 September 2002 15:50 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Maintainership of mod_ssl > > > > > > Hi Ralf and everybody > > > > Wouldn't it now be about time to transfer maintainership of mod_ssl to > > somebody else (if there is anybody willing and capable available) , as > > this software is now obviously unmaintained except for important > > security > > fixes. > > > > Ralf has done a tremendous job in providing and maintaining mod_ssl, > > but > > obviously has no more time left to actively work on it. > > > > But there are still people (me at least) who would like to enhance > > mod_ssl > > beyond the very neccessary. Unfortunately mails with patches to do so > > are > > not even replied. > > > > How do other people and most of all, how does Ralf think about this? > > > > Bye > > Tim > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
