On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:34:10 EST, Michael G Schwern wrote: >On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:19:38PM -0800, Gurusamy Sarathy wrote: >> I'm not sure what it is we're trying to solve here--has there been >> a specific complaint we're trying to address? "If nothing is >> broken, don't fix it" etc. > >Yes, yours. :) >http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/1999-04/msg02168.html >http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/1999-04/msg02144.html
That's all over and done with, isn't it? I meant has there been a _new_ complaint after we fixed that particular one? >Its an old one. I happened to dig it up while researching what TO_UNIX is >for in MakeMaker. The problem has largely been solved exactly as you >suggested back that, Perl's newline handling has been made smarter. Just >wondering if anyone is still having problems with this. > >If not, I'll leave it be. I might even tear out OS/2's special case. Sarathy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
