On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:43:26 +1100, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Once we have this logic in place, we no longer need to make a special > case for the perl core, but let every package that has a dual (or a > ternary) life define its master package.
I'm sorry, I cannot follow you. Can you make up a more specific example: which packages, which version numbers, which owners, which one is to be indexed and why and why not?
Let's say we have a module Foo::Bar, which has a dual life. It's distributed in the original (master) package Far-Tar-0.01.tar.gz and is also included in an another package Mar-Car-0.06.tar.gz. The module Foo::Bar has the same version in both packages. What I'm asking for is a way to tell the indexer to pick the package Far-Tar-0.01.tar.gz when asked for module Foo::Bar.
My proposal is to introduce a special variable inside the package Foo::Bar which will tell the indexer that its master package is 'Far-Tar'.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
