[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Josephes) writes: > Otherwise, CPAN will continue to grow wide at the top level.
I used to think that mattered. But then, we now have search.cpan.org, and there's not really much requirement for CPAN to be hierarchical any more. As I've written in the past (http://blog.simon-cozens.org/bryar.cgi/id_6280) good names for libraries are still important, but good names for applications are arbitrary. -- There's no cinnamon and no lemon or orange involved. If there were, it was a heretic who mixed it up and the mixer should be impaled on a stake and buggered by the Shrike for two hours, then taken down and forced to rub the wounds with the mix until death sets in. - Ingvar Mattsson *cares* about cocktails.
