In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Dolan writes: > > > Assuming it is based on DBI at its core, your module would fit better > > in the DBI extension area. I think DBIx::Backup::MySQL would be good, > > as it would leave room for expansions to databases other than ::MySQL. > > I think the opposite -- that DBIx:: should be for things that are > generally usable with DBI, where the "I" is independent. Things such as > backing up tend not to be database-independent. if we work it right, DBIx::Backup could be independent, while DBIx::Backup::MySQL implements the MySQL bits. :) -- brian d foy, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
