A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Baltasar Cevc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-09 14:45]:Can someone explain what appears to be the general purpose of the Proc:: namespace? I can interpret 'proc' many ways, so I'm not exactly sure.
would the solution be to extend something like Proc::Daemon or
to "downgrade" Net::Daemon (which seems more similar to what I
thought about).
I think ideally Proc::Daemon should be extended to cover all
common functionality, and Net::Daemon updated to extend
Proc::Daemon. That assumes reasonably compatible APIs of course,
or one might possibly support both API styles in both modules if
they are disparate -- so long as it doesn't break backward
compatibility. Of course you shouldn't hesitate to copy stuff
back from Net::Daemon to Proc::Daemon if desirable.
-ofer
