* Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-16 23:40]:
> >As for the “'foo!' => \$foo” thing I misunderstood your
> >example (I thought you were pointing out a bug or ommission)
> >because I *expect* the exact behaviour that you say is
> >“non-strict”.
>
> This seems to be a common reaction? Why?
>
> You wouldn't say
>
> --foo --no-foo
>
> if you just meant
>
> --no-foo
>
> Would you?
I don’t understand. If there was no need to be able to say
“--foo --no-foo”, then why do both exist?
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
*AUTOLOAD=*_=sub{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(",$\/"," ")[defined wantarray]/e;$1};
&Just->another->Perl->hacker;
