# The following was supposedly scribed by
# A. Pagaltzis
# on Friday 17 June 2005 03:05 am:
>I therefore further posit that the switch you called
>“--no-verbose” is a misnomer.
>
>It should be called “--start-verbose=0”, which indeed should be
>parsed in precedence order rather than command line order.
Ok. Then we agree :-) (can you tell?)
Uh. so everybody is emotional about '--no-'. Good. I'll leave that
behaving the way it has.
Using '--start-' is maybe not the best choice (mostly for length.)
In any case. How does G::L evaluate in precedence order? That's why
I'm writing G::?
There are other useful situations for controlling the order. We just
haven't covered them yet.
--Eric
--
"Everything goes wrong all at once."
--Quantized Revision of Murphy's Law
---------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------
