"A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Since weʼre at this: the one thing I still fall back to
> Getopt::Std for is small scripts. I love Getopt::Long, but it
> incurs a pretty high startup cost. Is there any chance you can
> play some deferred compilation cards to make it go faster?

This is one of the main reasons that Getopt::Long version 3
development stalled -- the startup overhead would double from
version 2. But in the mean time computers have become 5 to 10 times as
powerful, so would it still be a real problem?

-- Johan

Reply via email to