# The following was supposedly scribed by # Johan Vromans # on Saturday 18 June 2005 03:55 am:
>Would it be okay to have a generic 'deal with option' method... >E.g., name of >the option, type, real name (when called via an alias), the desired >value, and a reference to where to store the value. Most of this comes out of Getopt::Crazy::parse_spec(). It does still need some work. But I wonder if this sort of thing (a method that the author can call for each option) might be a better approach than a hook (if I'm understanding what you propose correctly.) --Eric -- "I've often gotten the feeling that the only people who have learned from computer assisted instruction are the authors." --Ben Schneiderman --------------------------------------------- http://scratchcomputing.com ---------------------------------------------