On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:31:48PM -0600, David Nicol wrote:
> On 12/2/05, Austin Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As long as the name isn't taken and it has some amount of logic, I
> > doubt the name of a module makes any practical difference any more. It seems
> > like the days of poring over proper module names should come to an end.
> >
> > *shrug* Just a thought.
> >
> > Austin
>
> hmmm.... maybe I'll do like Jonothan Borofsky
> (http://www.borofsky.com/numbers.htm) and just number my modules from
> now on
>
I think the interpreter might complain about that a bit-
use 22;
Perl v22.0.0 required (did you mean v22.000?)--this is only v5.8.6, stopped at
-e line 1.
:-)
Austin
