> Thus, having some math background one would identify
> Math::Interval::Arithmetic (or maybe more proper,
> Math::IntervalArithmetic) at a glance in a search for "interval".
Imo the former form should be heavily preferred over the latter.
Math::Interval
admits the possibility that there could be a wide range of modules related to intervals.
Math::IntervalArithmetic
Does not. Not only that but CamelHump identifiers are considered to bad style in the eyes of much of the community.
Yves
