> -----Original Message----- > From: David Nicol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 September 2006 01:48 > To: David E. Wheeler > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Module Authors > Subject: QD:: could mean "Quick and Dirty" > > > On 9/20/06, David E. Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2006, at 21:37, Darren Duncan wrote: > > > > I wonder if there should be a QD:: domain on CPAN for stuff like > > this? ;-) > > I think a QD:: domain is a bad idea. When I know that the interface > may undergo severe changes, I append a 0 to the name, for instance > the QD version of Dog::Walk might be called Dog::Walk0 to indicate > QD nature more strongly than a version number with a lot of leading > zeros would. When the interface settles down, release Dog::Walk, > then do bug fixes, performance enhancements, and add new features > in a backwards-compatible way.
I agree. If anything, you want ::QD to be a suffix to your module name, not a namespace. After all, why would anyone search in the QD:: namespace?
