Dominique Quatravaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Application::" is nearly pristine right now and that's why I proposed > it in the first place, but I understand that it's a bit of a mouthful > (or typeful?).
I think Application (or Applications) is a good idea. Its length does not really matter since it needs to be typed just once. (This would be different for modules.) So the simple script-application helloworld would be put on CPAN as Applications-helloworld-1.00.tar.gz. In an ideal situation this kit would contain: Applications-helloworld-1.00/MANIFEST Applications-helloworld-1.00/README Applications-helloworld-1.00/Makefile.PL Applications-helloworld-1.00/script/helloworld We would still have the problem where to put application specific modules that are not (should not be) visible to the rest of the world. -- Johan
