I agree with Chris here.
And the idea is not to have main package version drifting from
distribution version or the other way around.
jonasbn
On 13/09/2009, at 15.18, Chris Dolan wrote:
On Sep 13, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Shawn H Corey wrote:
Jonas Brømsø Nielsen wrote:
dist_name => 'Workflow',
dist_version_from => 'lib/Workflow.pm',
I would be tempted to:
dist_version_from => 'lib/Workflow/VERSION.pm',
Comments?
I thought about that too and rejected it as unnecessary complexity.
You still need a $VERSION in Workflow.pm anyway or else Workflow-
>VERSION() doesn't work right, so why not just put the version in
Workflow.pm in the first place.
Chris
