On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Bill Moseley <mose...@hank.org> wrote:
> For quite some time I've created modules for internal use and I don't > bother with h2xs anymore for non-xs modules and I just copy-n-paste some > existing Makefile.PL I have from another package. As a result of some > choice a while back all my modules use Module::Install. > > I guess I like the declarative format of Module::Install and features like > "test_requires", "install_share". Otherwise, I don't really care how the > module is built and installed as long as it works. And I have not in a long > time looked at the the different approaches in detail. > > So, I'm curious. Is there any kid of consensus on what to use for new > modules and why? Or is it still mostly a matter of opinion? > Dist::Zilla!
