Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Eric Wilhelm
# on Sunday 18 February 2007 12:25 pm:
I appear to be the world's only user of interlaced pod.
If I can't get any feedback on whether =head2 would be useful, can I
at least hear any objections or counter-examples to adding =cut into
the mix? This at least allows interlaced pod with the '=item' form.
Ok, so =item doesn't pass podchecker because it sees =cut before the
=back, and thus kwalitee complains. Bah. perldoc didn't mind it.
That's okay, I never liked using =item for actions anyway.
=head2 it is. I'll make that change today.
Since I've heard nothing about this for 3 months, I have to assume that
either nobody documents their build subclass or that everyone who does
is perfectly happy distancing their pod from their code.
Sorry, I wasn't really paying attention to this thread, but...
ATM my build subclass has no pod, but if I were to add any I would
certainly interlace with =head2 ... =cut sections above each subroutine.
Was there a problem with doing this?
