John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm fairly adamant that version.pm is feature-complete; I don't want > to add *anything* else to the base class. I am planning on releasing > version::Math which will cover what you discuss, though. I have been > playing with it for a couple of years, on a very low priority, > because I'm not happy with the interface, yet.
Sorry to bring this up (again) but I am still wondering why version is a pragma instead of a module. Especially now since you mention version::Math, an ordinary module in a pragma's namespace? -- Johan
