I thought that was what "build_requires" was for. I seem to recall some discussion that it was supposed to be everything up to actual installation and that further granularity with uncertain benefit, but a lot of toolchain support changes, wasn't a priority.
Regards, David On 7/31/07, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Had there been a discussion of something like this? > > I think META.yml should have test_requires, and possibly also > test_recommends. > > Particularly, since we have ACTION_retest(), we should ensure that > everything is available. > > --Eric > -- > Minimum wage help gives you minimum service. > --David Schomer > --------------------------------------------------- > http://scratchcomputing.com > --------------------------------------------------- > >
