demerphq wrote: >> If that's the case, perhaps the docs for Terse could use stronger language. >> Right now it's a little obtuse. >> >> · $Data::Dumper::Terse or $OBJ−>Terse([NEWVAL]) >> >> When set, Data::Dumper will emit single, non‐self‐referential >> values as atoms/terms rather than statements. This means that the >> $VARn names will be avoided where possible, but be advised that >> such output may not always be parseable by "eval". >> >> Something like B<don't use this to serialize data in production!> > > I guess. To me thats obvious given the <but be advised that > such output may not always be parseable by "eval">
Yeah, but you wrote a Dumper. :) Terse shows up in a bunch of examples, perhaps it should be removed from them? -- I have a date with some giant cartoon robots and booze.
